Visit SexyMike's column >>

SEXYMIKE

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 504
Member Since: 6/2008Last Seen: 10/09/2009

Bipartisan group agree to revive auto bailout

Read ArticleArticle Source: msnbc.com
advertisement

Aides to a bipartisan group of auto-state senators said Thursday they have reached a compromise to speed emergency loans to Detroit's Big Three car makers.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
37
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 18
{"commentId":4139884,"authorDomain":"SexyMike"}

Seems to me if more money had been spent on fuel-efficient vehicles, perhaps we would already be less dependant on oil!

{"commentId":4139884,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"SexyMike"}
  • 24 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:40 PM EST
{"commentId":4140344,"authorDomain":"ukwriter"}

Amen, Sexy Mike.  They don't need to be bailed out.  As Mitt Romny stated, they will just keep on doing the same old thing, if they don't suffer any consequences of their b ad policies.  Arriving on Capitol Hill in a $34 million dollar private jet, didn't help them any.  Why should I pay for them to be bailed out?

{"commentId":4140344,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"ukwriter"}
  • 27 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:10 PM EST
{"commentId":4140348,"authorDomain":"techie22"}

True, if Ari Fleisher as press secretary when asked if conservation

was in Bush's plan hadn't said, "that's a big NO !" this wouldn't be

happening.  But Thank God Congress isn't playing Russian Roulette

with the chances of another great depression which would be global. 

{"commentId":4140348,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"techie22"}
  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:10 PM EST
{"commentId":4140402,"authorDomain":"duriteacres"}

That's true but we have the last crude deposit in the world up in the ND area and the Congress & Senate have set on a Presidental Mandate issue in 2005 to develop it.  With that developed we would not need foreign oil.  Then too if they weren't sell crude from the Alaskan pipeline to Japan we would not be this dependent either.  What we need are more refineries.  The few we have have a choke-hold on our gasoline prices!

At least this is not a bailout per se, it is loan money that they wee eligible to get next year.  Maybe it will help keep some people off the unemployment lines. 

{"commentId":4140402,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"duriteacres"}
  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:14 PM EST
{"commentId":4140455,"authorDomain":"upnorthmpc"}

Typical uninformed bloggers,  you can’t change what is in the pipeline overnight.   

{"commentId":4140455,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"upnorthmpc"}
  • 7 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:16 PM EST
{"commentId":4140624,"authorDomain":"lschof"}

Maybe the CEO of Ford should use a part of his $28 million dollar a year salary to bail out his company.  This is beyond disgusting!

{"commentId":4140624,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"lschof"}
  • 25 votes
#1.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:25 PM EST
{"commentId":4140680,"authorDomain":"jimksmithstables"}

I think they should let them all fall including the Union. It will teach them all that greed is a bad thing. They say they are spending 5 Billion a month so how long will the 12 billion they get last if they continue to go the direction they are going.

 The CEO are overpaid and should be let go that would save millions for the company.

As far as the Union maybe they should look at taking a pay cut so the auto industry can afford to keep people working instead of letting them go.

It is not Rocket Science

{"commentId":4140680,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jimksmithstables"}
  • 23 votes
#1.6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:29 PM EST
{"commentId":4140709,"authorDomain":"jazzandsneaky"}

Or maybe those A List employees at Chrysler could give up their million dollar bonuses for this year.

{"commentId":4140709,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jazzandsneaky"}
  • 27 votes
#1.7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:30 PM EST
{"commentId":4140726,"authorDomain":"laschulz0309"}

Ok, we demanded the big cars!  Not the fuel efficient little-bittie cars.  The automakers responded to our demand.  And that demand has not changed.

You seem to want to hurt the "fat cat" execs at the top.  Ok, I can agree with that.  But if the bailout does not happen, there will be in excess of 3 million people unemployed.  It's not just the executive offices or the plants.  It's dealerships, steel workers, the tire industry, the people who make radios, speakers, GPS units, ball bearings, hinges, axels, you get the picture.  If this doesn't happen, the Great Depression of the 20's will look like a tea party compared to what our economy would look like.  It's a bitter pill...but in order to save us, we have to take it!

{"commentId":4140726,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"laschulz0309"}
  • 11 votes
#1.8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:31 PM EST
{"commentId":4140766,"authorDomain":"gozounlimited"}

As long as you need a fico score of 700 or higher to purchase a vehicle....the vehicle will not get sold....remember it is you and me that keep this economy going and the majority of us have been lambasted by job losses, home losses, uninsured illnesses, corrupt insurance companies, corrupt wall street, and unenforced federal law that protects workers. Get real....our corportate government destroyed us so now WE GET PUNISHED? Congress needs to crawl out from under its rock. It seems so painful for them to see the truth.....and help out the PEOPLE.....the ones they obviously despise.

{"commentId":4140766,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"gozounlimited"}
  • 17 votes
#1.9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:33 PM EST
{"commentId":4140852,"authorDomain":"upnorthmpc"}

Finally someone got it right-. 

{"commentId":4140852,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"upnorthmpc"}
  • 5 votes
#1.10 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:37 PM EST
{"commentId":4140861,"authorDomain":"ldyboaterh"}

Are we less dependent on oil because Toyota and Honda build fuel efficient cars?

How about if the U. S. had put tariffs on foreign cars so that the "sweat shop" employees of Asia that work for a $1.00 a day wouldn't create such a difference in the cost of construction.

Do you really think the auto industry employees in Michigan should work for $1.00 to compete.

And, don't let me get into the restrictions and demands the government put on U. S. auto makers, beginning with the catalitic converter.

And, don't let me get into the department of energy that CARTER created who had 16000 employees and 100000 contract employees today with a budget of 24 billion for 2008.  What are they doing?

{"commentId":4140861,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"ldyboaterh"}
  • 7 votes
#1.11 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:38 PM EST
{"commentId":4140912,"authorDomain":"df12"}

I've always believed with all their unbelievably huge profits and the fact that the Big 3 was pretty much an integral part of that, Big Oil should bail out the Big 3. Done.

{"commentId":4140912,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"df12"}
  • 11 votes
#1.12 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:40 PM EST
{"commentId":4140962,"authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}

Oil is not infinite on this planet, we should be stressing alternative power sources, not sucking the planet dry of a non-renewable oil.

{"commentId":4140962,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}
  • 6 votes
#1.13 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:43 PM EST
{"commentId":4140977,"authorDomain":"upnorthmpc"}

Big Oil should bail out the Big 3.  Everyone knows who "Killed the electric car ?"

{"commentId":4140977,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"upnorthmpc"}
  • 10 votes
#1.14 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:44 PM EST
{"commentId":4141000,"authorDomain":"duriteacres"}

Thanks idiot...you can't read either.  I said don't sell the crude to the Japanese out of the Alaskan pipeline.  I am not a typical blogger fool!  I happen to work for the oil industry.

Besides, if we cut all the private planes then Nancy Pelousi should not be getting a free plane either.   She is wasting our tax money on herself right and left. 

{"commentId":4141000,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"duriteacres"}
  • 4 votes
#1.15 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:45 PM EST
{"commentId":4141357,"authorDomain":"scanmenow"}

Most of us would have no problem telling her and her goonies to get their FAT ASS on a delta flight.  Can I be the one to tell them???

{"commentId":4141357,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"scanmenow"}
  • 11 votes
#1.16 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:04 PM EST
{"commentId":4141433,"authorDomain":"rany1691"}

You have got to be kidding me! After Detroit has spent the last 20 years high on the hog pursuing extrememly poor business practices and models, we are going to bail them out with OUR money? This is a bunch of bs and needs to be stopped. Let the automakers get their "loans" from the oil companies. Exxon-Mobil made last quarter in profits the total amount that they want. Let Detroit take a lesson from the foreign car makers and start making autos that are driver friendly, safe, fuel efficient and trustworthy. They should file for bankruptcy, get rid of the unions nad start over. It is not the end of the country as they make us to believe as they fly in their luxury jets to Washington. I guess this is just another Bushism getting laid in place to ensure he continues to make millions on the oil industry when he leaves the White House!

{"commentId":4141433,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rany1691"}
  • 9 votes
#1.17 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:07 PM EST
{"commentId":4141466,"authorDomain":"cakeman1961"}

I have one Question what goverment bailed out Preston Tucker.

YOU people see anything there.........................................

{"commentId":4141466,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"cakeman1961"}
  • 1 vote
#1.18 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:09 PM EST
{"commentId":4141482,"authorDomain":"bbblonde70"}

I am tired of union workers... auto, teachers, trades... blah blah blah-ing about not being paid enough, or having to pay a $10 co-pay... or their pensions not being enough! Welcome to the real world, workers pay into their 401(k), no pension, pay high deductables on medical insurance, and don't have free coffee... The union is an antiquated system that we don't need in our country... The greed in upper level management, can you imagine a flight costing $40k, and the union have pushed the big 3 into this mess... congratulations, you may be out of a job! Enjoy that cup of coffee while it lasts and sweep that floor for $23 an hour!

{"commentId":4141482,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"bbblonde70"}
  • 14 votes
#1.19 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:09 PM EST
{"commentId":4141607,"authorDomain":"martys-1"}

The deep rooted problem is the auto workers union.  Until those contracts are re-negotiated the big 3 will never compete with the foreign auto makers.  This bail should not happen.  They will continue to operate poorly and need more money in 6 months.

{"commentId":4141607,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"martys-1"}
  • 12 votes
#1.20 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:16 PM EST
{"commentId":4141651,"authorDomain":"paul-38"}

Governmental interference, outlandish exec pay and unreasonable union wages/benefits are some of the reasons the big 3 are in this mess. Google Chevy UK and see some of the vehicles being produced for european and asian markets. 45 mpg highway for an suv. Why are we not promoting ultraclean diesel technology here? The big 3 seem to be doing well overseas. What does that tell you?

{"commentId":4141651,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"paul-38"}
  • 8 votes
#1.21 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:18 PM EST
{"commentId":4141727,"authorDomain":"svaldaro3"}

Since I was an employee of a major airline after 911, I can remember that a "bailout" was not an option for any of the airlines at that time.  They received payment for 1 week that the airway system was shut down.  As far as govt. requirements, there isn't an industry under the microscope with Federal reg.s as the airline industry.  We all had to suck it up and get a lot leaner in the process; it wasn't easy but, in retrospect, it was the right thing to do! So, suck it up auto makers, stop palying politics and looking for handouts!  This goes for organized labor too!  Get ready, EVERYONE is going to have to make concessions...I feel your pain but know in the end it is the right thing to do especially for those expected to pay the freight for this give away...us!

{"commentId":4141727,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"svaldaro3"}
    #1.22 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:21 PM EST
    {"commentId":4141741,"authorDomain":"treycoale"}

    what does fuel efficiency have to do with auto makers conducting bad business. the problem is the union contracts and the ridiculus salaries and perks of the executives.

    how dare they show up asking for a handout in their private jets!!!

    i already support these people with my purchase of their product.

    {"commentId":4141741,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"treycoale"}
    • 7 votes
    #1.23 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:22 PM EST
    {"commentId":4141853,"authorDomain":"babsben"}

    Good thing they have put the bailout off until December.  It will give those CEO's time for a nice vacation in Hawaii!!

    {"commentId":4141853,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"babsben"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.24 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:27 PM EST
    {"commentId":4141916,"authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}

    Hey Randy,

    What ELSE would you like to blame on BUSH. AMAZING how some still go there.

    ENOUGH already. This certainly IS NOT his fault. Is that pimple that you woke up with today HIS FAULT ALSO??????????

    {"commentId":4141916,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.25 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:31 PM EST
    {"commentId":4142003,"authorDomain":"CL1"}

    Sexy Mike-----isn't  " fuel-effecient " a double-edged sword?  Aren't the batteries for the electric cars fairly expensiive -- 5-7K?  I keep wondering who's going to buy your used prius knowing they are still going to have to replace an expensive battery, and is that battery going to be obsolete when the time comes?  Some of the other alternatives like hydrogen would have to be really expensive leaving a glut on the dealer's lot, not to mention the time and cost of getting stations set up.  I'm just skeptical that taxpayers want to take the risk to help the big 3 go into " venture " mode.

    {"commentId":4142003,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"CL1"}
      #1.26 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:37 PM EST
      {"commentId":4142097,"authorDomain":"Germanyjon"}

      On his watch!!

      {"commentId":4142097,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"Germanyjon"}
        #1.27 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:43 PM EST
        {"commentId":4142144,"authorDomain":"audiogirl63"}

        NO BAILOUT! The CEO's should take a cut in pay, the UAW should agree to a cut in wages and benefits and the dealer network should be reduced. Why does GM service a dealer network of 7000 while Toyota has only 1500?  WASTEFUL POLICIES.

        Democrats and Republicans need to adopt a more fiscally responsible mindset.

        Use some of that "bailout money" to produce more/better public tranportation so we can address climate change, oil dependency and job creation.  This is the time for change, people, big change.

        {"commentId":4142144,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"audiogirl63"}
          #1.28 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:45 PM EST
          {"commentId":4142155,"authorDomain":"luvsbeingamom"}

          If I yell "HELP" enough, will they bail ME out?  My husband is disabled; I work full time; the military/government has been denying him VA benefits for the past 7 years; my medical insurance just went up $160 PER MONTH so now i'm paying over $500 a month for a major medical policy that doesn't provide much coverage; the housing market is in the gutter, yet they raised the assessed value on our home so that they can raise our property taxes!!!  I don't feel sorry for stupidity - they should have been making more economical cars even if they did keep making the gas hogs.  Just because Joe next door wanted one doesn't mean everyone did - I didn't. 

          Unfortunately, if they don't get bailed out, it is going to affect many innocent individuals who they probably pay minimum wage and who are struggling to feed their families as it is.  I am torn as to what they should do for this reason.  It is the struggling individuals my heart goes out to.  If they do get the bail out, they should be required to prove how they are going to make more economical cars as well as being more environmentally friendly - if they don't, shut them down and get judgments against them individually for every penny of it.

          {"commentId":4142155,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"luvsbeingamom"}
          • 2 votes
          #1.29 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:46 PM EST
          {"commentId":4142180,"authorDomain":"gozounlimited"}

          This is a major shift in power in our country....Corporations no longer are able to lead our legislators around by the nose. Finally THE PEOPLE will control the corrupt corporations who have destroyed this country....Don't fly into Washington in your private jet and hold our industries hostage....because we will destroy you....this time.

          {"commentId":4142180,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"gozounlimited"}
          • 3 votes
          #1.30 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:47 PM EST
          {"commentId":4142268,"authorDomain":"debibuchanan"}

          I completely agree with the Congressman that said "you don't put your last tourniquet on a dead man." These companies have been on the verge of bankruptcy before, been bailed out by the government before, settled debt with suppliers for 30 cents on the dollar before, so... why are we going here again.  If they haven't learned lessons to this point, then why are any of us even taking the time to consider their requests? 

          I am getting really tired of people blaming foreign auto makers, the government, the oil companies, in fact everyone except the BIG 3 (Losers).  The fact is that foreign automakers are building vehicles right here in the US, with US labor, using US resources and are successful.  Why is that?  They are dealing with the same economy, abiding by the same environmental legislation, paying US workers to build their products.  Oh yeah, they are not bogged down by these ridiculous union costs.  Their labor costs are approx. $30.00 per hour less.  Auto makers outside of Detroit and free of the UAW are able to pay FAIR wages and provide REASONABLE benefits for their employees all while making a dependable product and a profit.  Unless the Unions are stopped, they will succeed in bankrupting these companies.  If I were an auto worker, I would rely be asking myself if being overpaid and having excessive benefits is really worth the price they are getting ready to pay.  Let's see...a job that pays a decent wage or the unemployment line.  It is time to stop milking the system or suffer the consequences.

          {"commentId":4142268,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"debibuchanan"}
          • 14 votes
          #1.31 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:52 PM EST
          {"commentId":4142656,"authorDomain":"indigohalo"}

          Damn I'm sick of hearing CEOs with 9-digit compensation plans whine about how their corporations are going broke. Geeez! If they want to see the reason why, all they need is a mirror. The CEOs are overpaid and they make terrible decisions. I always knew GM would regret the day they sold all of their EV1 patents to Chevron (who then sold them to the Saudi royal family for safekeeping). So GM had to design the Volt from scratch. Oh, and they fought tooth-and-nail against every fuel efficiency initiative that came down the pike. Then, under Clinton, GM received a BILLION dollars to research a more efficient car technology. They built a single prototype car -- ever.

          The unions cannot escape blame either. They get paid too much. Period. (Just like their CEO brethren).

          To this I say to the Detroit-3: For refusing to innovate, for selling patents to Big Oil, and for making crappy cars for 30 years -- NOT A PENNY.

          {"commentId":4142656,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"indigohalo"}
          • 5 votes
          #1.32 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:16 PM EST
          {"commentId":4142676,"authorDomain":"christine-cornelius"}

          Your upset that the Big 3 flew to town on a $34 Million dollar jet, but Nancy Pelosi does it every week.  She wasn't happy with her small size plan so she insisted on a huge plane to get her back and forth to Washington.  Why can't she ride economy like the rest of us - is she and her staff too good to ride in a regular plane. 

          Remember, if you put the Big 3 out of business; you loose Billions in tax dollars, millions are out of work and the unemployment rate will increase astronomically.

          So for all of you sitting at your desk at work, imagine if it was your company on the line - wouldn't you want your job saved?????? 

          {"commentId":4142676,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"christine-cornelius"}
            #1.33 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:17 PM EST
            {"commentId":4143631,"authorDomain":"indigohalo"}

            Chris from Philly: But... we have the luxury of voting Nancy Pelosi out of office. Bob Lutz, et all, are putting the entire U.S. economy in the crapper through their greed and incompetence and we can't remove them at the ballot box.

            {"commentId":4143631,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"indigohalo"}
            • 3 votes
            #1.34 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:12 PM EST
            {"commentId":4143869,"authorDomain":"klbaetz"}

            I think we have ALL at one time or another been taken to the cleaners on interest rates from car dealerships.  They make all of this money off of "adding points" to our loans in the finance office, etc.. how in the heck are they broke all of a sudden???

            I can't believe how many greedy people want to get their hands on that tax payer bail out money! 

            And then.. they have the b*lls to show up in multi-million dollar jets begging for money????  That was a huge slap in the face to every tax paying American. 

            It just goes to show what these smug *ss CEO's have been getting by with.  They have no concern for the American people.  They are just trying to keep their houses in the Cayman Islands and their private jets ... while we continue to pay for their 6 and 7 digit salaries/bonuses.  DON'T BAIL THEM OUT.  MAKE THEM SUFFER ALONG WITH THE REST OF AMERICA.  MAKE THEM LIVE ON A PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK BUDGET AND SEE HOW THEY LIKE IT.

            {"commentId":4143869,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"klbaetz"}
            • 3 votes
            #1.35 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:27 PM EST
            {"commentId":4143909,"authorDomain":"rockingranny"}

            hmmmmmmm...."viability and accountability" - exactly what would be required of any borrower - hmmmmmmmm

            {"commentId":4143909,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rockingranny"}
            • 1 vote
            #1.36 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:30 PM EST
            {"commentId":4144087,"authorDomain":"daetime991"}

            The real problem with the bail out is if we leave the present managers in place. They should all be thrown out, no excuses allowed.
            If congress refuses to bail out the auto industry it will result in losses of over a 100,000 jobs by the auto producers and all the suppliers, and the ad agencies that promote their products. At that point the taxpayer will be saddled with the bill to aid all of these out of work people. Many of the workers will lose homes and end up being on welfare or worse. The taxpayer pays either way. I'd rather pay to keep people employed.
            The current management of the big three auto companies should be fired without any kind of severence pay or benefits at all. These men have had their chance and failed miserably. They have also made enough money that they should be set for life, if they are not, too bad.
            All future cars being produced should be required to get 50 MPG or better and by 2020 be required to produce at least some autos that get in excess of 100 MPG.
            This is possible. We made it to the moon when no one thought we could and we can produce a hydrogen or nuclear powered car that would need little if any of the petroleum products that we use so much of today.
            We are faced with a challenge and we can meet that challenge if motivated.

            {"commentId":4144087,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"daetime991"}
            • 3 votes
            #1.37 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:41 PM EST
            {"commentId":4144419,"authorDomain":"goldfish4ob"}
            goldfish4obamaDeleted
            {"commentId":4144899,"authorDomain":"inglett9"}

            When GM built the first commercial electric car in the late 90s it wouldn't sell. The battery technology wasn't up to the standards needed to build a successful vehicle. If it had been up to par, none of you were interested in buying one. I own American, I like American, I like keeping our money and jobs in American. The foreign companies who build autos in America don't pay tariffs on the parts sent here to be assembled at their plants. How about some of you look up what products these foreign countries allow us to export to them. The exports we are allowed to sell are heavily taxed to make them competitive with home made goods. Our Nation doesn't do this. The foreign companies have in the past been subsidized by their governments, just as AirBus is subsidized by the Europeans. No branch of the U.S. government subsidizes any of our industries. The states that have these foreign companies haven't imposed any restrictions on them. They aren't required to provide insurance or any other benefits, just a job. If Reagan hadn't imposed tariffs(that have since been removed)on the products from Europe and Japan, they would still be building overthere instead of overhere.

            {"commentId":4144899,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"inglett9"}
              #1.39 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:30 PM EST
              {"commentId":4144949,"authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}

              Step #1  -  Cancel the $57 per hour ($114,000/yr) union labor cost for assembly line workers.

              After that, everything else will be easy and they will be competitive again.

              {"commentId":4144949,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}
              • 3 votes
              #1.40 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:33 PM EST
              {"commentId":4145002,"authorDomain":"icenudown"}

              How about we inact a fair trade agreement with the Japanese. Then the Americans who insist on buying Japanese vehicles will pay more and have to wait to buy one. We as americans only keep our new vehicles for an average of 30 months, so why are we buying non american makes? And i know some idiot will say the Japanese vehicles are built in the US also, too those i say assemblied is not built. We assemble the 90% japanese parts ( GET IT ). And too every japanese car buyer i say Thanks for Nothing and may the next pink slip be yours!

              {"commentId":4145002,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"icenudown"}
              • 1 vote
              #1.41 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:38 PM EST
              {"commentId":4145135,"authorDomain":"david393071"}

              The only way that I would even consider approving a Loan or Bailout.

              1.  That the Corporate Board Members did everything possible, that includes liquidating their personal National and International Properties (including those hidden under relatives names), and used the money for the Corporation (none for themselves).  This has a precident in what a Private Business Owner must do to save his or her Company.
              If not then send them to a prison like Guantanimo (BO said Guantanimo is closing), It is US Policy not to negotiate during hostage situations with terrorists (3 million US Jobs held hostage by Obese 3 for money), under the Patriot Acts.

              2.  Complete to the penny (.01) public transparency of all money spent.

              3.  Re introduct the technology that was literally crushed by GM, the EV1, electric car with real improvements.

              4.  Back the renewable technologies that have been proven to work (since 1950).  Sugarcane to Ethanol (note: proven that Corn to Ethanol not effective, per US Dept Energy and US Dept Agriculture, UN World Bank). 

              5.  Build the renewable technologies vehicles in the US that do not require a complete change to the infrastructer (trillions USD).  Specifically, like the 3 million E100, and over 6 million Flex Fuel Vehicles (not including the Transportation Vehicles) currently built by GM, Ford, Toyota, VW, Peugot (not in the US).

              6.  Stop putting multimillion USD advertisements on Television, we are not buying what you are saying.

              7.  Defeat NAFTA and CAFTA and bring back ALL the Autoworker Jobs to the US.

              8.  No more building in Mexico and Canada that includes parts.  No preassembly in Mexico and Canada and shipping to Michigan for the installation of one or two bolt or nuts.  No more nuts and bolts from China.  You claim that you are American Corporations, stop being Mexican, Canadian, Chinese.  Any "subcontracting" must be American and meet the same requirements.

              9.  The Obese 3 (GM, Ford, Chrysler) must go to the Banks and Financial Institutions that were Bailed Out before they ask for anything.  If their credit sucks so bad that they cannot obtain loans from the Bailed Out Financial Institutions then that says that no one should bail them out or loan any money.

              10.  No legal loop holes, no excuses, like "well that 30 million USD bonus was planned in 2007"or "well that is how we do business, sending our employees to Spas".

              11.  Default is at Credit Card Interest Rates.  10 to 23 percent interest.  With reposessions (counted at manufacturing cost, not retail).  This includes all Corporate Board Member and Relatives (hidden assets) properties, nationally or internationally.

              {"commentId":4145135,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"david393071"}
              • 4 votes
              #1.42 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:48 PM EST
              {"commentId":4145190,"authorDomain":"genejb38"}

              Get the Facts before you open your stupid traps people!!! I read about fuel economy....... GM has more fuel efficency with 30+ mpg vehicles than Toyota! I hear about quality..... ALL of GM's brands, including Hummer scored ABOVE the industry average in the JD Powers Quality/Reliability survey. The Quality Gap is a myth people! The media has sold you and the US Auto Industry out by getting you to believe this crap! You show me one classic, anything Asian owned still on the road!!! You  can't! You've already shaved with it! The foreign transplants got millions and millions of dollars to settle here in the American Marketplace to compete against the US owned auto companies on our own turf unmolested. Meanwhile our products are tariffed out of their home markets. Why aren't we returning the favor here? No fair play here, but thats right only real Americans believe in that. All the US money made here by them goes right back to Asia! Who has America's interests at heart, the foreign companies or the American ones? Look no further than the response to 9/11. The US Auto companies donated through company and employee matching funds over 60 million dollar, fleets of vehicles, technical assistance, and manpower. The foreign companies gave nothing, zilch, zero! Oh yeah, Toyota posted a condolence bulletin on their website. GM took it upon themselves to settle the economy from panicking and kept everything running when the immediate downturn dictated they should cut back. This kept money flowing and defeated the terrorist goal of devastating our economy.Whether you believe it or not, if the Big 3 go bankrupt, this country does too. As for you foreign buying un-American people out there defending your idiotic choice of buying foreign, grow a pair and let me know where you work so I can refuse to shop there. Lets see just how important a true US Auto Workers pay is to you! Oh, and if Congress is really stupid enough to through away 398.2 billion dollars of tax revenue over the next three years by not loaning the money to us now, I'll see you and your families in the unemployment line!!!!!!!!!!

              {"commentId":4145190,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"genejb38"}
              • 3 votes
              #1.43 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:52 PM EST
              {"commentId":4145672,"authorDomain":"t-zirkle"}

              Enough with the bailouts, already! I understand that a major portion of the national economy is based on lending institution, etc. However, enough is enough. Our country is based on a Democracy and part of that Democracy is rising or falling based on ones actions or inaction's. Exactly how are the Lending institutions and auto industry going to repay the American people the hundreds of Billions used in the bail out? Wall Street crashed in 1929 and after a period of struggle we adapted and overcame. If these businesses continue to mismanage their funds, fire them. Let's get government oversight in place to ensure this doesn't happen again and insist on more corporate reporting accountability.

              It isn't my responsibility or yours to pay bills for badly run companies. I don't see anyone bailing me out from my personal debts. No, we need to tell the Auto industry, they have been overcharging the American people for decades recording billions in profits from plastic and Aluminum cars. Now, the party is over due to mis-management. It's time for the Auto industry to merge or go out of business.  Like every other crisis in history, the strong and smart companies will survive and we will be done with the dead weight lousy run companies.

              {"commentId":4145672,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"t-zirkle"}
              • 2 votes
              #1.44 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:32 PM EST
              {"commentId":4145727,"authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}

              US Auto Employee, you make good points. 

              My take on the article, is that the CEO's of GM, Ford, and Chrysler are asking for a "loan," not a bailout.  What's most troubling about that is that the "leadership" of these companies have not shown profitability in years, and if it's a "loan," then there is no way to remove really bad leadership; you know, the ones that flew their private jets to Washington with their tin cup out asking for a "loan."  If you or I were to go to the bank to request a loan for business purposes, we would have to produce a "business plan," for the bank to consider prior to approving our loan.  I find it interesting that not one of those Leaders had any sort of business plan with them to present to Congress.  And, it's kind of interesting that Congress hadn't seemed to think of that beforehand, and asked that they bring their objectives for moving their company toward profitability.

              The Auto Industry will, in one way or the other, be rescued short term.   It would be economically catastrophic not to do so.  However, the American auto industry does need significant changes starting at the "top" to reach being competitive once again.  I think most of us agree on that.   The quandary is, how do we make that happen?

              Personally, I've seen posts today that called these CEO's ignorant.  I just thought they were very arrogant, and it actually makes me feel sorry for the US Auto Worker, because these men think of nobody but themselves, and their families.  That's just mho.

              {"commentId":4145727,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"Sandra-293107"}
              • 6 votes
              #1.45 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:37 PM EST
              {"commentId":4145782,"authorDomain":"spreadex"}

                 I for one have never owned a foreign car and never will as long as we make them here. I have a 92 olds runs like a top has 250 thousand miles on it. My neighbors Toyota stays in the shop. Foreign cars are an illusion. Last moth a survey came out that stated The american Japanese car workers make 2 bucks an hour average less than the Detroit people. The people with the SUV's The big trucks and The escalades are just as much to blame as The big three. If there was no market they would not have built them. If money was not scarce they would still be selling.

              {"commentId":4145782,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"spreadex"}
                #1.46 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:41 PM EST
                {"commentId":4145807,"authorDomain":"wicked-wasp"}

                A US Auto Employee

                He is right on the money about this....the problem is that the peeps on the hill dont have vested intrest in the auto industry like they do in wallstreet.....hell they could cut out the pork that was in the bailout bill and give it to the big 3...thats about 150 billion in pork but they wont. They dont care about america...they care about themselfs...these are dems Pelosi and Reed...the people that told the unions to stand behind there candidate and now they wont stand behind them....its a sad time we are coming to. I admit the big 3 need to do some major reconstruction but the gov needs to get out of there way with all the sanctions and standards they put on the us auto industry. This whole bail out is a scam on the american people. there not even using the money the way they said there were going to and they have 1 man in charge of it all.....stinks if ya ask me!!!!

                {"commentId":4145807,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"wicked-wasp"}
                • 2 votes
                #1.47 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:43 PM EST
                {"commentId":4146086,"authorDomain":"whoofer2001"}

                Right on!  Maybe I've missed something but I haven't heard of Toyota, Honda, Nissan, etc. asking for help.  Maybe the others should be looking at what their doing.  More fuel efficient vehicles, better built vehicles or maybe just much better management of their business.  I suspect more of the latter.  I feel sorry for the workers but they are some of the better paid workers, thanks to the UAW.  I agree and say let them work it out themselves.  Maybe a good purging is just what is needed.

                {"commentId":4146086,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"whoofer2001"}
                • 2 votes
                #1.48 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:04 PM EST
                {"commentId":4146349,"authorDomain":"CL1"}

                goldfish4obama-----exactly as I see it.  There were several ' big spenders ' in Tech, Alternative energy and Investment banks and Insurance companies on the list I saw.  I only remember the names of those that gave $500 to $1mil.  Most of them only gave a fraction of the amount to the other side.  Congress will need to start paying all of them back, and will start with the auto industry.  Politics is soooo corrupt!!!

                {"commentId":4146349,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"CL1"}
                • 2 votes
                #1.49 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:25 PM EST
                {"commentId":4146459,"authorDomain":"BZe1"}

                It seems that many are beating up on the unions instead of beating up on the people that made the mess in the first place.

                1.The executivies are to blame for the mess they are in.  They were not giving back the millions plus bonuses they were taking home even as they saw that their companies were not competitive and were losing money big time on products they were making for the past 30 plus years.

                2. These companies are too big and not nimble at all in an ever changing world.  They have a mindset that they know what the American public want in a car and they hang on to that idea even as their competitors make smarter more fuel efficient cars that sell.   The big 3 may know what the American driving public want but certainly not what the American driving public need which is fuel efficient cost effective vehicles.

                It is always easier to blame the unions and thus the workers for just wanting a better standard of living during their working years and a pension to be able to continue to have a decent standard of living during their retirement years,  than blame the upper management of these companies with their big contracts for bigger salaries, bonuses, the best healtcare, etc who run their companies into the ground due their miss- management, lack of oversight, lack of insight, lack of inspiration, lack of originality, stick in the mud, know it all and  greedy ways.

                By the way, the problems that the big 3 are in didn't start this year when the financial markets imploded. The problems these companies are having have been going on for the past 30 plus years.  Other companies overseas have produced smaller, attractive, more fuel efficient well made cars and seem always to be on the cutting edge of technology and have shown that they were also willing to take the chance by bringing the product on line while the big 3 stuck to their guns because they knew best for the people.  Well now they have found out that they did not know best and that they were always too slow to change,  thus their problems have grown larger to where they are now- yet again - holding everyone hostage with their talk of millions losing their jobs if they don't get their corporate wellfare check that they say they need to survive.  It is just easier to blame the unions and the line workers than to admit to themselves that they are wrong and not nimble on their feet in an ever changing world and that  they have stuck to the same old ideas that are long passed their sell by date.

                Why is it that Corporate America can keep going to the govt trough for their welfare checks/handout and that is supposed to be ok,  yet the masses who are losing their homes, savings etc and cannot go to the govt trough for any aid, although these handouts are being given in the name of the very people - as guarantors of these handouts- , who are in need of help to keep their home out of forclosure and food on the table and a semblance of healthcare.  When ordinary folks get help  that sort of wellfare is bad, so why isn't corporate wellfare bad?

                {"commentId":4146459,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"BZe1"}
                • 2 votes
                #1.50 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:33 PM EST
                {"commentId":4146471,"authorDomain":"panga1991"}

                where was AIG's plan for the money?  seems like another double standard. none of them should be getting bailed out - they are all there as a result of poor business decisions and they expect us to bail them out while they run to the spa. grrrrrrr

                {"commentId":4146471,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"panga1991"}
                • 2 votes
                #1.51 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:34 PM EST
                {"commentId":4146546,"authorDomain":"win270"}

                Cars trucks ETC are not selling because no one is buying DUH!Car sales are falling like a rock and that is all car sales.Construction employment fell by 49,000 in October, with declines throughout the industry.  Since peaking in September 2006, construction employment has fallen by 663,000 not including the suppliers etc. So all I can say to the auto workers is would you like some Government  cheese with your whine.Why are you not concerned for the construction workers?Why are you not asking for bail out money for them hell they could build houses that no body is buying just as the auto industry can build cars no one is buying.

                {"commentId":4146546,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"win270"}
                • 1 vote
                #1.52 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:39 PM EST
                {"commentId":4146726,"authorDomain":"lindyhays"}

                I agree that "A US Auto Employee" makes some good points.

                Another point worth making is that the Japanese cap their CEO pay to no greater than seven (7) times that of the beginning or lowest pay level of the company.

                I'd love to see this happen in the US, but I'm not holding my breath.

                {"commentId":4146726,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"lindyhays"}
                • 2 votes
                #1.53 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:51 PM EST
                {"commentId":4147310,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                PartysOverDeleted
                {"commentId":4151309,"authorDomain":"jonis"}

                It's a buyers market - if I want to drive an SUV that's my choice so you want to thump on cars with fuel effiecency thump on the buyers not the auto makers.  You can't sell what people won't buy.  Also take into consideration that the Government and the EPA put fuel regulations & safety regulations on the auto industry this requires major money in retooling, redesign, etc.  they don't get financial help to do this - it comes out of their pockets.  I found it pretty hypocritical of the members of congress who asked if any of the auto reps had flown commercial to the meeting - wonder what were the last charges on the taxpayers dime where these congressmen/women stayed for their many meetings and conferences - my money is on it was the Super 8 motel.  Likewise there probably aren't many expense receipts for Bob Evans or Stuckeys on the congresses expense reports.  Flying on a corporate jet is cheaper than commercial for last minute flights - these executives don't fly alone they have support staff probably equalling at least 4 members so that little performance by congress just goes to show how ill informed they are and just looking to do an ego trip for the American public. Where were these same Congress people when the unsecured and improperly obtained mortgages were going on?  At least there are reasons behind the problems at the Big Three that didn't include fraud or smoking mirrors - plus too I guess the Big Three didn't line enough pockets of the Congress.  During 911 the Big Three also provided cars, trucks and millions of dollars of aid without asking for it back -they stepped up to help americans.  Shame on Congress - everyone is either directly or indirectly impacted by the auto industry.

                {"commentId":4151309,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jonis"}
                • 1 vote
                #1.55 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:59 AM EST
                {"commentId":4151902,"authorDomain":"thomasdaddy1"}

                Hind-sight  is always 20/20!  Focus on the now!

                {"commentId":4151902,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"thomasdaddy1"}
                • 1 vote
                #1.56 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:13 AM EST
                {"commentId":4153743,"authorDomain":"peoplechange2"}

                 Problem for me personally is my ex son-in-law, the Father of my Grandchildren, is a finance officer in the Ford dealership his father owns. He's already a deadbet Dad and if his dealership closes up shop, he has no job, no he will not and may not be able to pay his child support and I'm just pi**ed all the way around over the irresponsiblity all the way around.  My daughter is a nurse and yes she works her tail off to support her children to the best of her ability. Checked out the price of daycare lately? Two children, $800.00 bucks a month.

                {"commentId":4153743,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"peoplechange2"}
                • 1 vote
                #1.57 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:12 AM EST
                {"commentId":4153931,"authorDomain":"emoryhubert"}

                If there is to be a bailout the money needs to be given to hard working Americans with stipulations of buying cars or as in the case of the banks buying homes. this would do a better job of shoring up the economy and will also enable the average citizen to have some desposable income to put back into the economy. A simple solution to a simple problem, but then that would end slavery in the USA.

                {"commentId":4153931,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"emoryhubert"}
                  #1.58 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:25 AM EST
                  {"commentId":4172688,"authorDomain":"damien8258"}

                  suckers all around, dems and republicans alike, sure vote out pelosi, id like that idea, lowers inefficiency in congress (after all a 9 percent approval is worse than the president, isnt it?) all of the posters forget that america was founded on capitalism, thats what made the country great. a business plan from detroit, now thats bleeping laughable, if those boys havent got one now, never going to get one. hint, cut your costs, management and employees, chop, chop, and build smaller cars, heck even get the government to mandate smaller cars, no six and eight cylinder passenger cars in america. detroit builds those gashogs as thats where they make the most money, you want an overhaul in detroit, have those boys make just 3 and 4 cylinder vehicles. surely, innovation and simplicity would make america a world leader again, send those gas hogs to venezuela, russia and the rest of those polluting crude oil producing nations, they like em, we shouldnt drive them, at least in america. its so convienient, that both financial and now auto companies come to washington at once, didnt any of them hedge for the bad times, talk about terrible corporate vision and prudence. anyways, it will work out, the dems will spin those printing presses into overtime, and if you voted dem they will spend money on you too, i think. a little later on mr nochange if he gets reelected, which i dont think is that likely in 2012, will have to deal with the aftermath of all that money and liquidity thats been sprayed all over america. can you say jimmy carter? god bless america.

                  {"commentId":4172688,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"damien8258"}
                    #1.59 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:09 PM EST
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":4140127,"authorDomain":"eratobetsy"}

                    All anyone seems to worry about is fuel efficiency, but the Big Three have been losing ground for years.  It isn't just cost or fuel efficiency----their cars have been so poorly built and unreliable, that customers have been going elsewhere.  Gaining back customer trust is going to be a long road.  I'm not sure that bailing them out is going to keep them from going under.

                    {"commentId":4140127,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"eratobetsy"}
                    • 7 votes
                    Reply#2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:56 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4140282,"authorDomain":"barbsnetaddress"}

                    Quality is up already.  Read the reports or better yet buy a new American made car. 

                    {"commentId":4140282,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"barbsnetaddress"}
                    • 3 votes
                    #2.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:06 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4140306,"authorDomain":"carverxt-1"}

                    Which american made car would you be referring to Toyota or Honda?

                    {"commentId":4140306,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"carverxt-1"}
                    • 13 votes
                    #2.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:08 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4140381,"authorDomain":"ukwriter"}

                    They knew that they were losing ground and still built the same old vehicles, pontiacs, buicks, camaros...Mercurys....Ram Trucks....All muscle cars....The big three wouldn't listen and now they want me to use my hard-earned money to give them a hand up????  NO!!!!

                    {"commentId":4140381,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"ukwriter"}
                    • 8 votes
                    #2.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:12 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4140382,"authorDomain":"techie22"}

                    This loan will not be like the Paulsen blank checks.

                    There will be terms and conditions which I hope

                    includes slashing pay for the millionaires that drove

                    the industry into the ground, pardon the pun.

                    {"commentId":4140382,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"techie22"}
                    • 2 votes
                    #2.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:12 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4140556,"authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}

                    The domestics are not up to the quality, engineering or mileage of the competition.  Bailing them out to keep mismanaging a dying company is nothing short of incompetent. In my view allowing the government to have a part of the management and product development of any of the domestic automakers would be even a bigger mistake, I don't want the government in the auto industry.  Let them restructure like other insolvent outmoded company's do if they want to survive, the UAW and the state officials want a band aid so they can have business as usual. 

                    {"commentId":4140556,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}
                    • 5 votes
                    #2.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:22 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4140627,"authorDomain":"ldoret92"}

                    Well folks.  Here we go again. 

                    Wonder why our Congressional reps delayed in making a decision on this bail out (not bail out but $$$ just to keep the big 3 running as normal to support their unions and retirees)?  The delay is more than likely the same thing that happened to the $700B bail out of Wall Street.  Our duly elected Congressional reps stalled until they could input their pork barrel projects into the bill.

                    Just wait and see what is going to happen with this one.  Keep a close tabs on the FINAL BILL and WHAT WAS ADDED AND BY WHOM.

                    {"commentId":4140627,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"ldoret92"}
                    • 6 votes
                    #2.6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:26 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4141228,"authorDomain":"df12"}

                    It's not just poor mileage or poor quality but an issue of prestige and very poor residual values. The American automakers have ignored an increasing reality. I work in the automotive industry and have hands-on experience with almost every make and model. While there are a lot of people who buy BMWs and Mercedes' because of the badge, there are just as many people who refuse to buy an American make because of the badge. I can't tell you how many times I've heard: nice car, functional interior, but it's still a (Ford, Chevy, Chrysler). 

                    {"commentId":4141228,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"df12"}
                      #2.7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:57 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4141394,"authorDomain":"scanmenow"}

                      Hey Techie22, I think the KEY WORD in your post is HOPE!!

                      {"commentId":4141394,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"scanmenow"}
                      • 2 votes
                      #2.8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:06 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4141396,"authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}

                      Two of the BIG companies have eight planes a piece. Is that really necessary. Keep one and sell the other 7. Proceeds right back to the company. They spend 17 million ALONE on Viagra.. WTF is THAT????????

                      At one time, back when the unions were created, they were a good thing. NOT TODAY!! There are some members who abuse the system. I know of several of them that go to work for a couple of hrs., slip out to the titty bar in the neighborhood and have someone else clock them out. Way to rip off the company you work for. A lot of crap like that goes on daily at those plants. WHO oversees their shenanigans???? Stop the bleeding!!! Those exec. can't live on like 3 million a year instead of 28 million?? I'm plugging away, putting in my 8 hrs., 4 months a year I work 2 jobs-7 days a wk. all for a grand total of $35,000 a yr. Sometimes it's a struggle to make ends meet-------but I DO IT!!! No bail out here.

                      {"commentId":4141396,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}
                      • 4 votes
                      #2.9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:06 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4142192,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}

                      "Which american made car would you be referring to Toyota or Honda"

                      Neither are "American made" they are American assembled....Huge difference!!

                      {"commentId":4142192,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
                      • 3 votes
                      #2.10 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:48 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4143881,"authorDomain":"df12"}

                      And not ALL "American" cars like GMs and Fords are built in America! Oh, but the profits come here! What profits?

                      {"commentId":4143881,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"df12"}
                      • 3 votes
                      #2.11 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:28 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4143950,"authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}

                      The big 3 bailout,  Speaker Peloi steps up to the microphone and yells soooooweeee, suddenly there is a loud noise, some observers are alarmed but the old timers recognize the grunting and squealing, yes they have seen the old boars and sows elbowing the littler yearlings out of the way as they settle at the trough.  Soon enough the project that was designed to involve a rather limited number of industries and people will have grown into a major project of flea observation in Nevada and Marijuana research in San Francisco not to mention projects in Chicago, New Your and ever other city and town.  The cost?  Nothing the taxpayers cant handle after all they always do the right thing and reelect us the benevolent servants of the system. 

                      {"commentId":4143950,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #2.12 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:32 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4144222,"authorDomain":"daetime991"}

                      As to quality. I have a 2006 Chevy Silverado that has been just fine and no service issues at all. I also have a 2002 F-150 Ford V-6 that has about 100,000 miles that has been going and going without any problems at all. I do take excellent care of these trucks and they look almost as good as new. Care and service plays a big part in this. Most American cars are well built and I would never buy a foreign car for any reason.
                      Many people have ongoing problems with their cars because they do not get them serviced properly or take care of the finish. I see a lot of cars with terrible paint, it's mostly because they do not maintain the finish on the car.

                      {"commentId":4144222,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"daetime991"}
                        #2.13 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:48 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4144866,"authorDomain":"fwest52"}

                        Well, it's all about the unions. They have devastated many companies in this country. Well take the steel industry for example. I worked in the Republic Steel Mill for 9 months representing Exxon Oil. We were trying to manufacture a grade of pipe that was going in a special well. They failed every time they tried because of the unions. I wanted to plug in a grinder one day while at the plant to see how far a crack went into the pipe. I couldn't plug in the grinder because it was the electrician job and I waited an hour for an electrician to plug it in for me. It was like  that the entire time I was there. Poor production=poor product.  We had no choice but to give the contract to a Japanese steel mill. The unions will bring down the big three because they won't budge in changing anything. They don't care about anything except the money they can make off the back of the industry. Maybe the big 3 need to lose it all and regroup in bankruptcy court and let the unions dissolve.

                        What a stupid move, flying their multi million dollar corporate jets into Washington with a tin cup in their hands. I'm glad to see Congress doing their jobs now. I hope it continues.

                        {"commentId":4144866,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"fwest52"}
                        • 3 votes
                        #2.14 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:28 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4144931,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}

                        Me too, I haven't owned a foreign car since my wife wanted a Jetta in the early 80's....otherwise, it's been chevy trucks and cars...and only ones that are built in the US.....

                        Folks.....when buying any one of the big 3 vehicles, look at the VIN, only buy one that starts with a 1 (means built in USA) if you buy a foreign car with a 1 it means it's "Assembled" in the USA. A 2 means Canada (Most ford and Chrysler Trucks are Canadian..or a 3 (means Mexico) a K (Korea) W (Germany) J (Japan) 4 (Other, usually Australia)

                        So, for instance you own a Cavalier and the first digit on the VIN is a 3 Your cavalier was built in Mexico. (Many of them were) The new beatle is Mexican...

                        {"commentId":4144931,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
                        • 2 votes
                        #2.15 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:32 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4147412,"authorDomain":"01A"}

                        Were should I start. My first car A 1972 Mustang Grande, perfect till I totaled it. Yes definitely a classic but built Solid. The old cars were quality. Newer NOT! 1977 Ford Grand Torino major piece of junk. My father has a Pontiac that was gray back in the early 90's that the paint started coming off at 1 year of age andGM only covered part of the cost to re-paint it despite all the reported problems with that color. 1985 Mazda pickup perfect, traded because we started having kids 70k. Purchase new 1986 Chevy Camaro Z28 kept only 11 months- dash became a rattle trap due to poor quality. 1987 Mistubihi Precis- never had one problem husband drove to 198k and it was a 4 cylinder. We got more than every penny back on this car. Great on price mileage etc. for this type of car.  We had a 1988 Chevy conversion van that had the front end worked on 3 times during warranty and continued afterwards to the point we had to get a rid of it besides all the other costly repairs we had starting at about 60k. By the way the dealership was no help. 1994- Plymouth Acclaim, my husband drove this to 223k with no issues. 1995 Ford van was okay but steering tightness not the best and everyone kept telling us thats a Ford for you. Or what about the FORD - fix or repair daily jokes. 1994 Plymouth Duster good car for sons first car, 139k when he recked it. 1995 Ford Taurus front end issues, 1998 Ford escort transmission and front end issues both vehicles for son. 1997 Olds Intrigue we loved that car but ended up with major engine work due to a know problem with the model. Coolant and oil started to mix due to this flaw. Problem was right after warranty ended and then again we started experiencing the same signs and traded it immediately only 118k when husband traded. Father brought a Olds Cutlass with all the options in 98 has 160K now and has had a$300 to 400 bill -3 times for his ignition. Theft system keeps locking up and car won't run,this car uses a regular key not a programmed key. No one can help with this problem or overide the system. Dealer says it's been a known problem. Father thought  buying a new car but has no faith in the big 3 anymore. 1999 Cadilac STS at 67k issues with the air suspension $1800 repair bill still loved this car and it's quality and comfort. Newer model not even close- plastic, cheap and cold feeling in comparison. 2001 Olds Alero- okay but window issues due to plastic parts and has lots of rattles. 2005 Envoy Denali 53k air and heater went out real nice repair bill. Traded Cadillac in for 2007 Mercedes C280 THIS car is incredible and quality -can't say enough about. Looked at Cadillacs and alot of big 3 products, quality stunk. Doors have so much cheap plastic it's disgusting. Leather poor quality and thin in comparison to car I purchased. AND guess what I paid less for the Mercedes than the Cadillac's with bad gas mileage and poor interior quality. Yes- the old classics were from the big 3, but they weren't made of cheap plastic- doors, dashes. etc.  All our vehicles are serviced consistently. So don't push the crap the big # are quality. Chrysler products have been better for us, but my inlaws New Yorker had issues from day one including trim pieces falling off. Our Envoy Denali is worth $6500 less than we owe due to the gas prices and the value did not go back up after the gas went down. We had equity before this. Do you think we will trade this vehicle ever? We'll have to drive it into the ground, if it will last. Maybe the government should gives us ALL money for new cars since alot of the SUV and Trucks  are way upside down. At least we can get something for our tax dollars instead of basically throwing $$ out the window. Check your Blue Book values and the dealers don't even want to come close to those values on trades. Foreign cars are better on resale, why? Now- how many of us will be puchasing new cars with the way things are? Market down again 444 today. We would be crazy to take any loans out now- period. Even if we thought about it most owe more on their vehicles than they are worth. What are you going to do for a down payment and to pay off your previous loan? Why would the Government throw money to the big 3? Sales are not going to go up but will continue to plummet. That's as bad as the subprime loans. Toyota and Honda's sales are down too. Chrysler filed bankruptcy years ago- did people still puchase their cars -you bet, otherwise they wouldn't still be here. If anyone on this blog had the credit issues the big 3 they couldn't get a loan or a bailout. Bankruptcy will make them restructure or fail just like Chrysler did years ago and is in trouble again. Funny Toyota projected the future and quit producing the SUV. trucks etc at some of their plants  to make way for fuel efficient. They paid attention to the economy. Trucks had resale problems starting around 2005-6 due to fuel cost. When they were making the profits they should of planned ahead. Any bailout and all our family and extended family has already said they will not consider any of the big 3 again. We are the only one's in our family with a foreign car at this time.

                        {"commentId":4147412,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"01A"}
                          #2.16 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:47 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4148237,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                          PartysOverDeleted
                          {"commentId":4149150,"authorDomain":"jayekoehn"}

                          Just agreeing with carver....I've owned both "American" vehicles, known as Ford and GMC and the so-called imports of Honda AND Toyota.....From experience, both the Honda and Toyota were far more reliable, required less care, got better gas mileage and in general were simply better made cars than the so-called "Amercian" cars.

                          The Big 3 ever think of checking with those guys to see how to to run a company, much less produce a quality vehicle? BTW, my Honda is still running with over 220,000 miles on it and the only problem I've had is needing the transmission changed after living in the mountains. Worth the repair? You betcha....

                          The Toyota still cruises around...

                          {"commentId":4149150,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jayekoehn"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #2.18 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:18 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4154018,"authorDomain":"peoplechange2"}

                           As far as the JD Powers Award won for American Cars? THAT"S BS. I sold cars in the past and the award was given by each other to make themselves look good. So Usautomaker, give up that argument for an excuse.

                          . I own a Honda Accord LX with 143,000 miles on it and runs like a top. Every American built car I bought in the past never made it to the 60,000 mile mark without major overhauls and NO TRADE IN VALUE. Shoddy work, lazy, hard to fire employees due to contracts with Unions.  Be P.O'd all you people if you want as in love America or leave it...Kiss my Petunia. I love America to the point I am willing to do what I have to do to be able to remain a consumer not a bottom feeder.

                          {"commentId":4154018,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"peoplechange2"}
                            #2.19 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:32 AM EST
                            {"commentId":4159719,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                            PartysOverDeleted
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":4140171,"authorDomain":"rbachone"}

                            I do not see what the problem is with the auto industry

                            here is my bail out plan for them

                            Since Exxon/Mobile gouged consumers to get a windfall of 40 billion dollars

                            then the auto execs should be knocking on the doors of Exxon et al and saying

                            Hey oil companies you were able to gouge so much profit because our vehicles give such @!$%#ty mileage so loan us 25 billion to tide us over

                            {"commentId":4140171,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rbachone"}
                            • 6 votes
                            Reply#3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:59 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4140447,"authorDomain":"duriteacres"}

                            Oh, I bet Chavez would get a charge out of that one. 

                            {"commentId":4140447,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"duriteacres"}
                            • 2 votes
                            #3.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:16 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4141625,"authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}

                            SO TELL ME WHY people STILL buy gas at Citgo???????? Every time I see cars at a CITGO gas station I WANT TO SCREAM!!! Go elsewhere. If you boycott those stations whose primary source of oil is from the Middle East or Venezuela, don't patronize them.

                            BP oil uses minimal gas from the ME. Use Hess gas, Marathon. I believe the info is on line who does and who does not!

                            {"commentId":4141625,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}
                            • 1 vote
                            #3.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:17 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4141804,"authorDomain":"treycoale"}

                            rose,

                            a better question might be "why do we allow Citgo gas in our country period?

                            {"commentId":4141804,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"treycoale"}
                            • 2 votes
                            #3.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:25 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4142029,"authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}

                            TRCO-- Right ON!!! BUT-------if more people out there would get on board and NOT cater to those stations who buy from the ME or MR. CHAVEZ, trust me, they would feel it. DO you remember when FRANCE forbidden us to use their air space during the first Gulf War?? Americans did something simple like boycott their wine. THAT HAD an incredible effect on their industry. We also boycotted (for a period of time) travel there. THEY were besides themselves. THAT had a positive effect and IT WORKED!!! They were crying how they were feeling the pain in those respective industries. I'm a big wine drinker and STILL today- I DO NOT buy wine from France and as much as I would like to go see the Eiffel Tower, not for now!!! Oh well!!!

                            {"commentId":4142029,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}
                            • 1 vote
                            #3.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:39 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4142037,"authorDomain":"gracchus"}

                            Tell me again what BP stands for?

                            {"commentId":4142037,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"gracchus"}
                              #3.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:39 PM EST
                              {"commentId":4142256,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}

                              "British Petroleum" the company that uses a lot of Alaskan oil and canadian oil and has plenty of businesses here in the United Staes employing 1000's of Americans!!

                              {"commentId":4142256,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
                              • 2 votes
                              #3.6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:51 PM EST
                              {"commentId":4144100,"authorDomain":"jerryberry1"}

                              Oh yes..oil companies like BP should be nominated as the Greatest Humanitarians...even after being convicted and fined for price gouging. HELLO!!! Say what you will about Citgo but I Know some very poor families in the Northeast that benefited greatly from the heating oil provided free or at low cost by Citgo.  All oil companies are leeches one way or another... and even though Sarah Palin forgot about it the supreme court sided with Exxon/Mobil this summer on the beat down settlement Alaskans got for the Exxon Valdez.

                              {"commentId":4144100,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jerryberry1"}
                              • 1 vote
                              #3.7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:41 PM EST
                              {"commentId":4144373,"authorDomain":"daetime991"}

                              We get about 40% of our oil products from Canada. Another 40% from Mexico, and a large amount from Venezuela. We buy less than 20% from the middle east. look it up, these numbers are real. Why be pissed at the middle east? Vent your rage on Canada and Mexico.
                              It's time we used our own resources. We have them. The 4 corners region of Utah and Arizona have about 2 trillion barrells of "oil from shale" that we could be using. The tree huggers are keeping us from getting to it. It has already been proven with the Alaska Pipeline that we can get resources without destroying the envoronment.

                              {"commentId":4144373,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"daetime991"}
                                #3.8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:56 PM EST
                                {"commentId":4144782,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}

                                Tree huggers aren't keeping you from getting squat from Shale oil...do some research....shale oil is extremely expensive to do!!

                                {"commentId":4144782,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
                                • 1 vote
                                #3.9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:22 PM EST
                                {"commentId":4154112,"authorDomain":"peoplechange2"}

                                Tree huggers aren't the problem. It's the very fact that refineries were not built and are as old as dirt BECAUSE the CEO's preferred to line their pockets so don't give me that crap. Houstonian at one time. Been there, seen those refineries with no budge from the CEO's to do more than put a band-aid repair on them.

                                {"commentId":4154112,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"peoplechange2"}
                                  #3.10 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:38 AM EST
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":4140200,"authorDomain":"greene0723"}

                                  How about insisting that some of the money necessary for the health of these companies be taken from the top executive's salaries. The CEO's must take pay cuts and the unions must be more agreeable to concessions. Insist that these companies build fuel efficient, dependable, durable vehicles that will eleiminate ANY need for foreign oil. Have the dopes that created this crisis start contributing to it's solution!

                                  {"commentId":4140200,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"greene0723"}
                                  • 3 votes
                                  Reply#4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:01 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4140518,"authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}

                                  The first thinf they should be forced to do is sell their fleets of private jets.

                                  {"commentId":4140518,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}
                                  • 9 votes
                                  #4.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:20 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4142069,"authorDomain":"naomivillebrun"}

                                  I agree with you on this. 

                                  Many, many of us have learned to spend more than we make and taking a pay cut would be tough (but easier than no income at all after unemployment fizzles out and you end up taking a minimum wage job if you can find one).  If they don't realign many of the ridiculous salaries (do maintenance workers really make $23/hr?), make significant concessions and reinvest a big chunk of their top heavy salary and bonus in their own companies why should we bail them out?  They can drive (in their company-comped luxury auto), or fly commercially where they need to go.  The wealthy beggars needs to get reacquainted with poor and middle class folks.

                                  {"commentId":4142069,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"naomivillebrun"}
                                  • 4 votes
                                  #4.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:41 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4144468,"authorDomain":"cjm123"}

                                  I'm glad to see the people on the thread here are putting some well-deserved blame on the Unions...I don't see any major media stories on how destructive they have been...of course the CEOs make too much money, but that is *all* I see being covered in the mainstream news, no mention of Unions!  Remember, the Unions contribute big to political campaigns, too, so that is going to be on the minds of those who are going to have to run again in a couple years for Congress...always watch the money trail...

                                  {"commentId":4144468,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"cjm123"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  #4.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:02 PM EST
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":4140205,"authorDomain":"blathnat"}

                                  These companies DO NOT DESERVE A BAILOUT!!!!!!! They've known the deal for decades; they make a shoddy product AND flood the market with said product. They know their business model is antiquated and in need of revision. It appears that what they really expect is the Government to tell them what to do; since they are unable to make a decent decision regarding anything.

                                  {"commentId":4140205,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"blathnat"}
                                  • 8 votes
                                  Reply#5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:01 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4140274,"authorDomain":"bevmore12"}

                                  One of the major reasons they are in trouble is because they did not develop fuel efficient cars. To give them money designed for innovation of fuel efficient cars to meet their payroll and pay their bills should be illegal. They should go through bankruptcy. Why should taxpayers have to support those with $75.00 an hour jobs? As taxpayers we need to protest. I am tired of hearing how many people will lose their jobs and that companies are to big to fail. Let free market enterprise work, Congress should stay out of it.

                                  {"commentId":4140274,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"bevmore12"}
                                  • 5 votes
                                  Reply#6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:05 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4140850,"authorDomain":"samlee927"}

                                  Moneymaddness, I live in rural NC where $75.00 is a big days pay for a great deal of people that cannot buy a $75.00 per HOUR auto. Agreat amount of this bailout money will go to the auto workers union, te need some more new $30,000,000.00 Jets and Limo's. as well as another raise to put them around the $3,000,000.00 per year annual salry. Can we aford this with most of our jobs going out of our country??

                                  {"commentId":4140850,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"samlee927"}
                                  • 5 votes
                                  #6.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:37 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4141145,"authorDomain":"mortonwanda"}

                                  No one has mentioned this...remember Robert Nardelli, who is now CEO of Chrysler?  A few years ago he was CEO at Home Depot and almost caused it to go under.  The majority of employees hated his arrogance and were very happy to see him go.  Now he's at Chrysler going to Congress with his hand out.  Looks like he should be kicked out at Chrysler too since he didn't create anything new for them!

                                  {"commentId":4141145,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"mortonwanda"}
                                  • 4 votes
                                  #6.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:52 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4142278,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}

                                  Nardelli is the ONLY one that said...."Yeah, I'll work for $1"

                                  {"commentId":4142278,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  #6.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:53 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4145467,"authorDomain":"and03"}

                                  Nardelli's willing to work for $1.00, eh? Sounds like he's the only one who understands that he needs to cooperate with the powers that be.

                                  {"commentId":4145467,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"and03"}
                                    #6.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:14 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4147435,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                                    PartysOverDeleted
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":4140287,"authorDomain":"ymvv2000"}

                                    I'd much rather see a bailout of the auto industry than the banks.   To me, the auto industry is the symbol of what makes America great;  Banks are the symbol of American greed (yes, I'm stereotyping).  What I definately don't want to see is continuation of the 'golden parachute' or 'performance bonuses' (LOL) to any private company that is functioning with taxpayer aid.

                                    {"commentId":4140287,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"ymvv2000"}
                                    • 3 votes
                                    Reply#7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:06 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4140386,"authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}

                                    UAW is the symbol of greed. No bailout!!!!!

                                    Those who can do, those who can't vote democrat and join a union!!!!

                                    {"commentId":4140386,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}
                                    • 4 votes
                                    #7.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:13 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4140545,"authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}

                                    UAW isn't half as greedy as the ceos, those smirks on their faces should be slapped of.

                                    {"commentId":4140545,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    #7.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:22 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4140638,"authorDomain":"rbachone"}

                                    salaries and benefits for the ceos should be at minimum cut by 3/4 until they start showing a profit

                                    and the union contracts must be re negotiated to bring them in line with wages for similar jobs across the country

                                    these are manufacturing jobs and should not have 50, 60, 70 dollar plus per hour that's insane

                                    {"commentId":4140638,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rbachone"}
                                    • 7 votes
                                    #7.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:27 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4140650,"authorDomain":"jsroach2"}

                                    You're an idiot.  We're talking about a MILLION jobs.  The Republicans don't want this to go through because they want to destroy the Union!  You think the economy is bad now, see what happens when GM and Chrysler fold and there are potentially a million more people looking for work that just isn't there. 

                                    Good luck with that.

                                    {"commentId":4140650,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jsroach2"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    #7.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:27 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4140897,"authorDomain":"rbachone"}

                                    just who are you calling an idiot

                                    that's a heck of a way to start a conversation

                                    {"commentId":4140897,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rbachone"}
                                    • 4 votes
                                    #7.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:40 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4140981,"authorDomain":"bboderck"}

                                    I'm sorry that so many people stand to lose their job, but hey - I stand to lose mine as well, and I'm not in an industry that's going to get a bailout, that's for sure.  And theres MILLIONS more like me!  Those workers should have been saving some of that high hourly wage instead of spending beyond their means.  While me - Jane Q Public has been doing the right thing all along expected to prop them up.  Well, I don't want to see anyone having to live in a cardboard box because they lost their job, but I don't want to live in one either, just to pay the taxes it's going to take to keep them in their homes!

                                    {"commentId":4140981,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"bboderck"}
                                    • 3 votes
                                    #7.6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:44 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4141083,"authorDomain":"sjones34668"}

                                    Even with a bailout jobs will need to be cut and whose to say 1. that the remaining jobs stay in the USA and 2. That they don't go belly up  despite a gazillion dollar "loan."

                                    {"commentId":4141083,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"sjones34668"}
                                      #7.7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:49 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":4141440,"authorDomain":"kimrobinson71"}

                                      Well, [insurance company] AIG, which I don't think anyone would think was as important to the American economy as the auto industry ... got $40 billion just now to make it up over $100 billion. To some extent, let's not have a white-collar/blue-collar bias in our public policy. You know, those who say, hey, go bankrupt so you can cut back on what the unions have won — the unions have already made some concessions. But, you know, we've had enough anti-union activity, and enough increase in income inequality in this country. I don't want to set a precedent that bankruptcy now is a way in which you undo what gains unions have been able to hold on to.

                                      Barney Franks in his NPR interview posted yesterday.  According to Franks, now that the Wall Street bailout has been approved, it's discrimination not to bail out any other groups that have also failed to make a profit. 

                                      What about all the contractors, skilled laborers and blue collar workers (the backbone of the building industry) in my state who are out of work as a direct result of Wall Street and Fannie Mae? 

                                      Hey, what about my massive student loans?  I work in education/social work - I'll never make a profit!

                                      And the "slippery slope" is a myth?

                                      {"commentId":4141440,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"kimrobinson71"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      #7.8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:08 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":4141606,"authorDomain":"psvasta1116"}

                                          snoop-730106   are you as ignorant as you are narrow-minded?  I am a democrat who can do, and does do and I'm not in a union.  Mass generalizations are the fuel of the uninformed.

                                      {"commentId":4141606,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"psvasta1116"}
                                      • 3 votes
                                      #7.9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:16 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":4142027,"authorDomain":"cougarbraun"}

                                       your an idiot i do believe i read that the republicans want this bail out and the dems are the ones that are holding it back

                                      {"commentId":4142027,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"cougarbraun"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      #7.10 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:39 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":4142117,"authorDomain":"cougarbraun"}

                                      how about the farmers who REALLY are the back bone of america wheres the help for them the projected futures for milk for the farmer is 10/100 pounds of milk come on thats not right they work 7 days a week 365 up early and to bed late wheres the help for them if they go down then all theses bail outs dont mean a damn thing

                                      {"commentId":4142117,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"cougarbraun"}
                                        #7.11 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:44 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":4142262,"authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}

                                        That socialist Barney Frank-can't stand him. He and a few of his cronies are SOLELY responsible for what is going on in the housing market. Let's not forget his boyfriend at Freddie Mac. He's got some nerve. I HOPE the FBI gets done real soon with their investigation so we can ALL see what the ultimatum will be. Can't be soon enough for me. He's incompetent to the fullest extent and has NO business running any committee in Congress. I mean really, can't his fellow Congressmen SEE this with this man? He should not be allowed to hold court ANYWHERE!!

                                        {"commentId":4142262,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"roseybullet01"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        #7.12 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:52 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":4144308,"authorDomain":"kimrobinson71"}

                                        your an idiot i do believe i read that the republicans want this bail out and the dems are the ones that are holding it back

                                        Nope, that was an SNL skit.  An understandable mistake though.

                                        {"commentId":4144308,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"kimrobinson71"}
                                          #7.13 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:52 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":4145445,"authorDomain":"genejb38"}

                                          The US Auto Industry was doing all the hard things to turn itself around. The banks are to blame for this whole mess. No loans = No car sales. Where is all the complaining about the handouts they got? 750 billion of our hard earned tax dollars with no grilling before Congress! If the loans were available we would be selling cars, making money, and would never of had to show up in DC looking for a LOAN in the first place !!!!!!!!!

                                          {"commentId":4145445,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"genejb38"}
                                            #7.14 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:12 PM EST
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":4140328,"authorDomain":"jlmhamlett"}

                                            ok, lets look at it this way

                                            There are approx 305,700,331 people in the US (US sensus) out of this #, how many are licensed drivers? ok, now how many of these licensed drivers are credit worthy enough to purchase a new car? Of these buyers, how many have bought a NEW car in the last 3 years?

                                            Now, with the economy in the shape it is in and NO good news in the foreseeable future, how many of these credit worthy buyers are going to get further into debt?

                                            Next....

                                            Cars today are built to run and last for alot longer correct? Also, with the depreciation of NEW cars at a huge loss, alot of educated and credit worthy consumers are turning to low mileage used cars (ie, lease turn ins and repo's) where they do NOT have to take that BIG new car depreciation.
                                            And last but not least......... In the last few years while our economy was booming, a large majority of credit worthy buyers were leasing and or purchasing cars every 2-3 years rolling their UPSIDE DOWN equity from car to car. Are the banks and lenders going to suck up 1,2,3,4 thousand in negative equity on a new car purchase with the financial instability now???


                                            HECK NO !!!!

                                            So, as hard as the "BIG 3" will hurt our economy in they collapse, what will change the NEW car sales industry that will produce larger sales to create revenue large enough to "repay" this loan/bailout

                                            {"commentId":4140328,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jlmhamlett"}
                                            • 5 votes
                                            Reply#8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:09 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4141252,"authorDomain":"mortonwanda"}

                                            Instead of bailing out the big 3, why not give vouchers to all licensed drivers in the USA to trade in for a new car?  That would get some of the old rattle trap cars purchased from "Tote the Note" car lots off the road and help clean up the air.  Also it would give the big 3 an opportunity to "make sales" which is whats hurting them at this point.  Few people are buying cars because they are so strapped for cash due to the rising costs of gasoline, heating oil, food, health care, etc.

                                            {"commentId":4141252,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"mortonwanda"}
                                            • 1 vote
                                            #8.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:58 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4141954,"authorDomain":"james2008j"}

                                            I am on a waiting list for my new Smart car why is there a waiting list?

                                            One year to wait for a new car. It is ridiculus.

                                            As for Detroit. Give them the money and then when they go broke we will know we did help them.

                                            If there was an emergency then they could lower the wages to $20 an hour starting tomorrow. Aint going to happen.

                                            {"commentId":4141954,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"james2008j"}
                                              #8.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:33 PM EST
                                              Reply
                                              {"commentId":4140368,"authorDomain":"gdedman"}

                                              It's like giving a crack addicted person money and saying, here's the money now go away but don't spend it on crack.

                                              {"commentId":4140368,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"gdedman"}
                                              • 9 votes
                                              Reply#9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:11 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":4141478,"authorDomain":"kimrobinson71"}

                                              LOL! ;0)

                                              {"commentId":4141478,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"kimrobinson71"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              #9.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:09 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":4142529,"authorDomain":"cougarbraun"}

                                              the best thing i heard today from collin cowherd on espn raido he was talking about the auto bail out and he said for them to show up in there private jets asking for money was like a guy dressed up in a top hat and a tux showing up at a soup kitchen and that was the best analogy i have ever heard

                                              {"commentId":4142529,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"cougarbraun"}
                                                #9.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:09 PM EST
                                                Reply
                                                {"commentId":4140393,"authorDomain":"minix"}

                                                I agree, these companies do not deserve to be bailed out!  Poor management and poor decisions have led to this and they must accept the consequences of their decisions.  In the end, the need for cars will still be there.  The remaining car companies will have to increase production which means they will need more factories and employees.  They will buy the failed companies factories and hire their experienced employees.  Let them go!

                                                {"commentId":4140393,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"minix"}
                                                • 5 votes
                                                Reply#10 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:13 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":4140398,"authorDomain":"evr"}

                                                It temporarily would divert to troubled automakers money from a program that currently finances the development of fuel-efficient vehicles. The aim would be to cover their immediate expenses.

                                                Interesting, but not sure what it means.  Money that currently finances development of fuel-efficient vehicles?  Are they accelerating an approved program, or is money already going to the manufacturers for this?  Don't believe the immediate expenses are associated with this program, rather it will be used to perhaps bring supplier payables current and fund the pension and health care costs?  How much?  How many more billions will then be needed to develop fuel-efficient vehicles and how long will it take to develop these vehicles.  My guess is cashflow will remain insufficient to cover debt service in this economy.

                                                The real question is how does this provide immediate help for the consumer/taxpayer to purchase vehicles?

                                                {"commentId":4140398,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"evr"}
                                                • 2 votes
                                                Reply#11 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:13 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":4140400,"authorDomain":"mrcarey"}

                                                I'm guessing you people all make more than your counterparts do in China, India and elsewhere. I wonder if you'll have the same opinion when it's your job at risk?

                                                {"commentId":4140400,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"mrcarey"}
                                                • 1 vote
                                                Reply#12 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:14 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":4140757,"authorDomain":"rbachone"}

                                                redeyes

                                                yes indeed my company just cut wages across the board, higher % cut on the execs

                                                every employee went for the cuts to keep their job

                                                boo hoo boo hoo the bad economy is hurting everyone except those with union contracts

                                                just read an article about ridiculous terms for union reps screwing tax payers collecting full salary from their jobs as police, teachers, DPW and on and on... they collect full pay from the cities and towns and counties and states yet have not worked a single hour on the job for many many months in some cases years while they conduct union business and get a salary from the union as well... so what's wrong with this picture? If I do not show up at work I do not get paid but they do

                                                then they cry don't touch our benefits, don't cut our pay boo hoo

                                                {"commentId":4140757,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rbachone"}
                                                • 4 votes
                                                #12.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:33 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":4141370,"authorDomain":"ccouturetr"}

                                                Don't have a job right now but I agree with them!

                                                {"commentId":4141370,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"ccouturetr"}
                                                  #12.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:04 PM EST
                                                  {"commentId":4141764,"authorDomain":"julied"}

                                                  At the rate our Congress is going,  all of our jobs are at risk as well as our homes.

                                                  {"commentId":4141764,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"julied"}
                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #12.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:23 PM EST
                                                  {"commentId":4144607,"authorDomain":"luvsbeingamom"}

                                                  Everyone's job is at risk in this economy!!!  Sometimes I just want to shake people until their teeth rattle - maybe, just maybe, then they'd wake up to the reality of life.

                                                  {"commentId":4144607,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"luvsbeingamom"}
                                                    #12.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:11 PM EST
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":4140412,"authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}

                                                    $73/hr=assembly work(monkey work

                                                    I DON'T THINK SO!!!!!!

                                                    {"commentId":4140412,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}
                                                    • 7 votes
                                                    Reply#13 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:14 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":4141497,"authorDomain":"chrisfarrell"}

                                                    I agree with you--this is crazy.  I am for workers rights, but come on.  This is insane.  The auto industry should be completely revampted from the top down.  Their labor cost all through out the companies are what is killing them. 

                                                    I am afraid if the government does not help them restructure then they will all be going to Mexico.  Which is even worse than bailing them out. 

                                                    On the unions, at one point they became more powerful than the businesses and the Gov. had to limit their power--the government should look at this again.  Workers deserve fair working conditions, pay, benefits--but at this rate our whole economy is suffering.  It would be better to lower wages and keep jobs in this country than to lose jobs totally. IMO.

                                                    {"commentId":4141497,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"chrisfarrell"}
                                                    • 4 votes
                                                    #13.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:10 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":4145752,"authorDomain":"meteorman"}

                                                    Hey all you guys talking about cutting automaker's wages, 

                                                    Maybe you should take a pay cut in whatever industry you're working in, so we can buy the product your company produces for less. 

                                                    Let's have government step in and cut your wage, so that your company can survive during this economic crunch.

                                                    Let's have the government step into whatever industry you work in and cut your wages, so that  your industry will be viable. 

                                                    Where do you guys get this $73/hr silliness from?  That's based on a 40 hour work week.  20 hours overtime paid at time and a half on that wage is an additional 113880.00 per year.   Having been raised in the Detroit area, there is no f'n way you are going to convince me that U.S autoworkers are potentially making 265000.00 + a year. 

                                                    Show me official data (not some bs from a right wing website quoting Rush Limbaugh paraphrasing somebody).  

                                                    In the mean time, please unplug your computers, put them back in the box, and return them to the stores you purchased them from.  You guys are too stupid to own computers.

                                                    {"commentId":4145752,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"meteorman"}
                                                      #13.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:39 PM EST
                                                      {"commentId":4145992,"authorDomain":"meteorman"}

                                                      73.00 per hour is 151840.00 per year based on a 40 hour work week.  This site stripped that figure in my original post because I used a "slash" character. 

                                                      {"commentId":4145992,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"meteorman"}
                                                        #13.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:57 PM EST
                                                        {"commentId":4146056,"authorDomain":"meteorman"}

                                                        73 per hour X 40 X 52 = 151840.00 The figure of 151840.00 per year got stripped from my original post. 

                                                        {"commentId":4146056,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"meteorman"}
                                                          #13.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:02 PM EST
                                                          Reply
                                                          {"commentId":4140419,"authorDomain":"ujerzy"}

                                                          Once again we hear "inaction is simply not an option", and out comes the checkbook and up goes the federal deficit. 

                                                          Haven't we learned anything from the financial sector bailout?  That too was a kneejerk reaction to "do something, anything" and now some 290 billion later the banks are being "urged" to make loans with the money, and the government is seeking to "encourage" the banks and wall street to not pay out bonuses and acquire other institutions with the money they got.  And to top it all off, there still isn't an oversight committee in place to see just what the billions is being used for.

                                                          This is truly sickening.     

                                                          {"commentId":4140419,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"ujerzy"}
                                                          • 7 votes
                                                          Reply#14 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:14 PM EST
                                                          {"commentId":4142062,"authorDomain":"bastinc"}

                                                          No accountability by the government, and we the voters let them keep on going, call them, write to them, show up at there door, take back our country now!  Blogging won't get it done, yes I am guilty for wasting time blogging too!

                                                          {"commentId":4142062,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"bastinc"}
                                                            #14.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:41 PM EST
                                                            {"commentId":4146290,"authorDomain":"daetime991"}

                                                            Writing to our representatives, e-mailing them and faxing them has very little impact. Diane Feinstein said thet she received over 80 thousand faxes and e-mails, in one day, asking her not to vote for the banking bail out. She said she voted for it anyway because she felt that the voters didn't understand the issues. That is the kind of representation that the voter gets from most of our elected officials. They are smart and we are too stupid to understand anything, so they become our mommies and daddies. But we should continue and not give up.

                                                            {"commentId":4146290,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"daetime991"}
                                                              #14.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:20 PM EST
                                                              Reply
                                                              {"commentId":4140424,"authorDomain":"kds918"}

                                                              the system is broken the union has ruined the working class of america and is no onger viable. You cannot support somthing that is not vaible aon the backs of US taxpayers. If the senent approves this it shows how pathatic adn reluctant we are to take our greed to task

                                                              {"commentId":4140424,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"kds918"}
                                                              • 5 votes
                                                              Reply#15 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:15 PM EST
                                                              {"commentId":4140431,"authorDomain":"jyakscoe"}

                                                              UAW has no ones to blame for the problem then themselves, without major concession from the UAW forget it

                                                              {"commentId":4140431,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jyakscoe"}
                                                              • 7 votes
                                                              Reply#16 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:15 PM EST
                                                              {"commentId":4140457,"authorDomain":"gdedman"}

                                                              Absofrikkenlutly

                                                              {"commentId":4140457,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"gdedman"}
                                                              • 3 votes
                                                              #16.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:16 PM EST
                                                              {"commentId":4144218,"authorDomain":"jerryberry1"}

                                                              Too true...they are going to HAVE to make some concessions...current workers and retirees.  When my Dad retired he was guaranteed full insurance premium coverage til he and my mom died.  He died 3 years ago and my 82 year old mother is now paying her insurance and prescription premiums IN FULL herself.  So much for promises.  The future isn't what it use to be and we all have to learn to live with what we cannot fix.

                                                              {"commentId":4144218,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"jerryberry1"}
                                                                #16.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:48 PM EST
                                                                {"commentId":4149411,"authorDomain":"meshelemw"}

                                                                So, jimbo, it's the Union's fault, not the "fat cats" who can't manage their way out of a grocery bag. It is the Union's fault just because people want a living wage. We should get rid of the Unions and pay the workers a $1 an hour just like China, Korea, South America. Screw the American worker! jimbo my bet is your a republican, huh? To hell with people as long as you, or the corporation, make a buck.  Greed Over People, that's your motto!

                                                                Instead of the workers making concessions make the executives and board of directors make the concessions. I work for performance based pay, and I would bet most of you folks here do too. Why is we hold CEOs is such high regard that we allow them to redistribute almost all the wealth upwards. Here we are fighting over the few measly crumbles that they let tumble down on to us. Thank God for the unions, they are the only ones fighting for us, we should stop fighting against them.

                                                                Walmart was so afraid of the unions they tried to terrify their workers into voting against the Dems. By the way  Walmart as huge as it is, is one of those companies who don't provide health care unless an employee is full time and they never have "full" time employees.

                                                                I think some of you folks here live in a bubble. You talk about people who want health care as too lazy to work for health care. I think most of you don't know that a lot of companies don't provide health care to anyone below management. Many, many, many companies don't offer health insurance to their employees. We are not talking about mom and pop shops, either. Multi-billion dollar companies who don't take care of the workers. Thank God there are still Unions out their at least protecting some of the workers in our country.

                                                                {"commentId":4149411,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"meshelemw"}
                                                                  #16.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:41 PM EST
                                                                  {"commentId":4151274,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                                                                  PartysOverDeleted
                                                                  Reply
                                                                  {"commentId":4140436,"authorDomain":"EarlyOne"}

                                                                  Bankruptcy!

                                                                  Bankruptcy!

                                                                  Bankruptcy!

                                                                  Do not give in!  Amercan Free Enterprise doesn't include bailouts, for gods sake!

                                                                  {"commentId":4140436,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"EarlyOne"}
                                                                  • 11 votes
                                                                  Reply#17 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:15 PM EST
                                                                  {"commentId":4140440,"authorDomain":"sneila"}

                                                                  Sounds like this is another big $$$$$ taxpayer funded bailout....even with the money it is only a matter of time.

                                                                  {"commentId":4140440,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"sneila"}
                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  Reply#18 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:15 PM EST
                                                                  {"commentId":4140446,"authorDomain":"williamportor"}

                                                                  This bailout should come with strings attached. NO MORE MULTI MILLION DOLLAR SALARIES FOR EXEC'S, AND NO MORE PRIVATE JETS!!

                                                                  {"commentId":4140446,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"williamportor"}
                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  Reply#19 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:16 PM EST
                                                                  {"commentId":4140508,"authorDomain":"sneila"}

                                                                  And make/build cars we will buy! This is sooo insane...this bailout...if it goes through will accomplish nothing in the long run...except increase our tax burdens!

                                                                  {"commentId":4140508,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"sneila"}
                                                                  • 8 votes
                                                                  #19.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:19 PM EST
                                                                  {"commentId":4146314,"authorDomain":"daetime991"}

                                                                  HEY!!! How about that Mini-Cooper!!! 37+ mpg and fun to drive

                                                                  {"commentId":4146314,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"daetime991"}
                                                                    #19.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:22 PM EST
                                                                    {"commentId":4149638,"authorDomain":"christopher-calbat"}

                                                                    Dan, 

                                                                    HEY!!! How about that Mini-Cooper!!! 37+ mpg and fun to drive

                                                                    There's no fewer than 20 at my local carmax all 2007-newer with low miles, and selling for WELL below what they were bought for. This is the problem.  Most educated consumers don't buy new cars. The immediate depreciation just isn't worth the effort. Doesn't matter who makes it.  Honda or BMW or Ford or GM. New car sales are down across the board. 

                                                                    So looking at the 2008-2009 cars isn't really relevant..you have to look at the lease returns (2006-2008) and dealer cars. These are the best value for the money, usually the best features, and almost all of them are factory certified. (I only buy factory certified vehicles, call it peace of mind) US cars have improved in the last 2 years, but in the market buyers are actually buying, (2005-2007) they were not doing so well in quality and fit/finish. 

                                                                    Now one that just irks me to no end. Why is that Toyota/VW/Mercedes/BMW all START their warrenties at 4 years 50,000 but US manufacturers are reluctant to offer above 3 years 36,000 miles? (Except on the powertrain)  Why would I want to buy a product that if I finance for 4 years is only under warranty for 75 % of my loan? Forget patriotic, that's just irresponsible. And considering all of the ridiculous reasons finance companies have started to find to increase your rates, not having your vehicle under warrenty could be a realistic next step for them. 

                                                                    {"commentId":4149638,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"christopher-calbat"}
                                                                      #19.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:09 AM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      {"commentId":4140460,"authorDomain":"campyone"}

                                                                      What Gettelfinger really means when he says "inaction is not an option" is  inaction isn't an option if he's going to keep his job. He should get in line with the auto company execs and all of them should help with this bailout by paying GM everything they've made in salaries and bonuses over something like $100,000 a year, then sell their vacation homes, yachts, stocks, options and every other asset they've accumulated, and put that money back into the companies too. That seems like a fair price for them to pay for running their companies into the ground.

                                                                      {"commentId":4140460,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"campyone"}
                                                                      • 8 votes
                                                                      Reply#20 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:17 PM EST
                                                                      {"commentId":4141615,"authorDomain":"julied"}

                                                                      I LOVE THIS ANSWER!!!!!! Jack Spratt.   But we can forget this since these people are not Lee Ioccoca.

                                                                      {"commentId":4141615,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"julied"}
                                                                        #20.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:17 PM EST
                                                                        Reply
                                                                        {"commentId":4140466,"authorDomain":"eashley"}

                                                                        The head of the UAW saying doing nothing is not an option. What a surprise! How much do these union employees make an hour? How much do the contribute to their so called Cadillac health care plans? Does the retirement plan really pay out 95% of their wages, forever?

                                                                        {"commentId":4140466,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"eashley"}
                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        Reply#21 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:17 PM EST
                                                                        {"commentId":4149514,"authorDomain":"meshelemw"}

                                                                        Ed, aren't you fortunate to be so wealthy that you don't have to worry about health care in your old age. Your anger at the UAW is misguided, it's not the autoworkers that are causing this problem it is the CEOs and the Directors. If you compare the wages of the line-workers to the Executives you'll see immediately where the problem is. The workers are making a living wage. They don't have multiple homes, private jets, lavish vacations every few weeks. It the CEOs, CFOs, the VP of everything and anything, that have driven this economy in the tank.

                                                                        PROFIT FOR PERFORMANCE! If a company does well, the people at the top should do well, if the company is going in the ground the decision makers should be the ones hurting. The people on the line are just doing what they are told to do. And Ed, until you stand on that line and do the hard work these folks do everyday you have no right to say on iota about what they should get paid.

                                                                        {"commentId":4149514,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"meshelemw"}
                                                                          #21.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:54 PM EST
                                                                          Reply
                                                                          {"commentId":4140470,"authorDomain":"robertcrogan"}

                                                                          Now that we bailed out the people that own this country. Who is going to bailout us little people? I live in a single income family with two young children.How do I explain to them that santa clause isn't coming this year? 

                                                                          {"commentId":4140470,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"robertcrogan"}
                                                                          • 4 votes
                                                                          Reply#22 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:17 PM EST
                                                                          {"commentId":4140662,"authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}

                                                                          I so agree. The people are the foundation, not the banks, insurance companies and corporations. If I had the money it cost for one trip to DC on a private jet I could have all of my bills. This is disgusting.

                                                                          {"commentId":4140662,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}
                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #22.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:28 PM EST
                                                                          {"commentId":4141010,"authorDomain":"cakeman1961"}

                                                                          just give away more money that this country does not have to begin with.Horay for the foreign country's May we the united states of america have more money.. I know I know we only owe you a couple trillion already it will be okay.

                                                                          {"commentId":4141010,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"cakeman1961"}
                                                                            #22.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:45 PM EST
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            {"commentId":4140482,"authorDomain":"gdedman"}

                                                                            Find who voted for the bailout and vote them out.

                                                                            {"commentId":4140482,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"gdedman"}
                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                            Reply#23 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:18 PM EST
                                                                            {"commentId":4140601,"authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}

                                                                            Great idea!!!!

                                                                            {"commentId":4140601,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}
                                                                              #23.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:25 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4140655,"authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}

                                                                              You are dreaming, we just voted the worst congress in history back into office. They know they can do whatever they want and they won't be held accountable, they will jsut blame somebody else and their ignorant followers will buy it hook line and sinker.

                                                                              {"commentId":4140655,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}
                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #23.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:27 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4140694,"authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}

                                                                              The worst in history? I think not. Just because they aren't going to play the Bush game?

                                                                              {"commentId":4140694,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}
                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #23.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:29 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4140831,"authorDomain":"rbachone"}

                                                                              carlos

                                                                              so why do you say the congress is worst in history?

                                                                              The dems have been in charge with a razor thin majority and every turn the republicans use their filibuster (they use to call politics of obstruction) to block everything except what bushwhacker wants. The republicans have used the filibuster more in the last 2 years than the previous 15 years so who are the obstructionists?

                                                                              {"commentId":4140831,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rbachone"}
                                                                              • 5 votes
                                                                              #23.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:37 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4140877,"authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}

                                                                              Salem

                                                                              You must be an idiot if you approve of the job congress has done the last 2 years

                                                                              WAKE UP!!!!!

                                                                              Worst approval ratings of any congress in this nations history

                                                                              Are you sleeping with the beast(pelosi)

                                                                              {"commentId":4140877,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}
                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #23.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:39 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4140950,"authorDomain":"rbachone"}

                                                                              so snoop

                                                                              how is a majority of one in the senate being block at every turn by the republicans make any sense of their job in the last two years

                                                                              your buddies the Greed Over Patriotism party were in control for 12 years and they are the ones that got us in this mess in the first place

                                                                              what are you sleeping with Rush or maybe Bill O

                                                                              {"commentId":4140950,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rbachone"}
                                                                              • 4 votes
                                                                              #23.6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:42 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4141045,"authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}

                                                                              Are YOU sleeping with Bush, or Cheney? Get over yourself.

                                                                              {"commentId":4141045,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}
                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #23.7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:47 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4142052,"authorDomain":"mhelwig"}

                                                                              Carlos I agree 100%! Anyone who does not think that this is the worst Congress in history is naive! When the Republicans were in control the first 6 years of Bush's regime, the Dems allowed the Patriot Act to take our liberties, and they allowed the establishment of the NAU, etc, and the last two years have done nothing to reverse any of this legislation, but instead Obama voted to renew the FISA legislation. Both parties allow the Federal Reserve to continue to fleece americans and both backed the bailout. This is a joke!! I am so sick of people who are blinded by partisonship!! Both parties allowed NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT, WTO to be passed. Both parties have allowed the Iraq War to continue. Open your eyes people!

                                                                              {"commentId":4142052,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"mhelwig"}
                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #23.8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:40 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4143523,"authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}

                                                                              rbach and other believers, I detest both parties and am amazed anyone would defend either but to why I think they are the worst congress in history, lets see the lowest approval in history,, the least legislation in history, ridiculously inept oversight of the meltdown (remember no one in the oversight committee's saw it coming, both party's by the way)  let see more...willingness to see the economy unravel for partisan advantage, earmarks tied to the bailout package.  That has been the last 2 months or so, how much more do you need?  The partisans on both sides are willing to do nothing anytime it serves their purpose and usually when they do something its worse!  So maybe I shouldn't be complaining.  Here is a question for you, most of these scalawags have been serving for many many years and up until now they have maintained a system that has given us less than stellar results for say the last 150 years or so, my question is since the same 2 corrupt party'srun the show and have run the show for so long why do you believe that reelecting them will encourage change?  Further, why should we believe these tired partisans want any change other than a change in the power structure?  If that's what you call change, then you got what you wanted.   

                                                                              {"commentId":4143523,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"carlostoadvine"}
                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                              #23.9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:06 PM EST
                                                                              {"commentId":4151253,"authorDomain":"rbachone"}

                                                                              Carlos

                                                                              I agree neither party is serving this country well

                                                                              I have been following this congress pretty closely since the dems got their 1 vote majority and have been disappointed time and again with their inaction and also have watched the republicans run rampant with their obstructionist politics with their use of the filibuster. Now they have a substantial majority beginning in January and will watch closely if anything changes

                                                                              I feel the level of curruption and greed in Washington is fueled by the lobbyists and to begin to fix the problem all lobbyists should be outlawed and eliminated. This would remove some of the corporations from our government. Then their is campaign reform, not the BS that McCain touts but true reform this spending of half a trillion dollars on a presidential election is just obscene. Our politicians are being bought before they get elected

                                                                              I am doing the wait and see what happens over the next 12 - 18 months and if there is any change coming we will see it in action by then

                                                                              {"commentId":4151253,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"rbachone"}
                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                              #23.10 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:51 AM EST
                                                                              Reply
                                                                              {"commentId":4140497,"authorDomain":"Bdave"}

                                                                              You have to be kidding me. What is gettelfinger prepared to give up. The unions have been the problem from the start. Let them file for bankruptcy and reorganize with new labor contracts. if they don't-tuff luck!!!

                                                                              How anyone can't see this as the only fix is beyond me.

                                                                              {"commentId":4140497,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"Bdave"}
                                                                                Reply#24 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:19 PM EST
                                                                                {"commentId":4140505,"authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}

                                                                                Gettelfinger and the UAW have ruined the Big 3. Let them file chapter 11 and cut the anchor(UAW) loose!!!!

                                                                                {"commentId":4140505,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"dizzlewomen"}
                                                                                • 5 votes
                                                                                Reply#25 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:19 PM EST
                                                                                {"commentId":4142000,"authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}

                                                                                The ceos ruined the big 3, they wear thier lear jets like giant boners and to hell with anyone else. They will never willingly give up their perks to fix the problem. It all starts at the top, always does.

                                                                                {"commentId":4142000,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"readmerrilee"}
                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #25.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:37 PM EST
                                                                                {"commentId":4145907,"authorDomain":"blanfor0101"}

                                                                                They dont have Learjets...

                                                                                {"commentId":4145907,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"blanfor0101"}
                                                                                  #25.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:51 PM EST
                                                                                  {"commentId":4149610,"authorDomain":"meshelemw"}

                                                                                  Snoop, Do you really think it is the UAW? Are you that blind? The big 3 CEOs came in lear jets.....and it's the Union killing the auto industry? These men have steered these companies in to disaster and YOU blame the unions! OH MY GAWD!

                                                                                  Pres Carter tried to rein in the auto companies years ago, but Reagan came in and assured the big 3 that if they build gas guzzlers people will buy them, he was right but very short sided. If we would have kept the Carter emmissions standards we probably wouldn't see the amount of foriegn cars on our roads. Big oil backed Reagan and both Bushes so now we have a failing auto industry.

                                                                                   The big 3 deserve a loan and chance to reorganize. Get rid of the CEOs and the Directors, make that one of the contigencies of the loan. Everyone at the top is out. Bring in new people with new ideas, retool the plants and make smarter, more energy efficent vehicles. If the build them people will buy them. (also make them more affordable) 

                                                                                  {"commentId":4149610,"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423","authorDomain":"meshelemw"}
                                                                                    #25.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:05 AM EST
                                                                                    Reply
                                                                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 18
                                                                                    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"424165","isPrivate":false}
                                                                                    Leave a Comment:
                                                                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                                    {"threadId":"424165","contentId":"2132423"}
                                                                                    Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                                                    Stop TrackingStop Tracking